The prescribing of drugs is an essential skills for medical doctors. Given that approximately 50% of all consultations end with a prescriptiuon, it is essential that medical doctors prescribe drugs effectively, safely, and cost-effective. However, the irrational prescribing of drugs seems to be a general problem in medical practice, occasionally leading to serious consequences. Additionally, the transition from medical students to junior doctor is often experienced as a major change, and medical students reported feeling unprerared for prescribing responsibilities. This is perhaps not surprising. because in many clinical clerkships and preclinical curricula focus on establishing the diagnosis, with little time being devoted to therapeutic reasoning. In this PhD-project, we hypothesize that in order to prepare students for their role as therapeutic decision maker and to improve prescribing competencies, they should be trained in the contact of their future profession.

 

 

 

 

Every medical graduate is by law authorized to prescribe drugs. In order to do this safely and effectively, they should have acquired a minimum set of prescribing competencies at the point of graduation. Graduates should have at least sufficient knowledge of commonly prescribed drugs and the ability to adequately treat the most common diseases. Whether this is the case in the Netherlands, or even Europe, remains unclear. In this thesis/PhD project, we will investigate several prescribing competencies of nearly graduates: essential knowledge, prescribing skills and attitudes (self-reported confidence, preparedness and opinions). Different methods, such as clinical cases, knowledge assessments and questionnaires will be used and compared with each other. This thesis not only includes graduates in the Netherlands but also in a large number of European countries. We hypothesize that graduates in The Netherlands and Europe lack essential prescribing competencies and that effective undergraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics is crucial to improve this gap.

 

 

 

Student run clinics (SRCs) are outpatient clinics and exist for more than forty years now. They are completely run and organized by undergraduate medical students. These clinics were founded as free clinics in order to deliver care to patients who otherwise could not afford or attain regular (insured) healthcare. In this thesis/PhD project we will research the educational value of the SRC concept for medical (pharmacotherapy) education. Learning in a student run clinic is ultimate context based learning. Context based learning (CBL) is learning in a setting similar to the setting of the future profession. The effects of CBL include the boost of intrinsic motivation and the willingness of students to invest in themselves. The context part could be further enhanced by an earlier introduction of bachelor students into the clinic including its attending responsibilities. Thereby, they can experience the clinical setting, get responsibilities and learn. We hypothesize this context would boost their intrinsic motivation and would lead to efficient and effective training of complex skills like prescribing

 

 

 

 

Many antimicrobial stewardship programs fail to consider behavioral, cultural and organizational factors in their approach. They lack clear analysis of the root causes of inappropriate prescribing at the ward level. This may lead to suboptimal interventions, especially on the long term. The Dutch Unique Method for Antimicrobial Stewardship (DUMAS) project represents a new approach by using participatory action research (PAR). In essence, we measured antimicrobial appropriateness on seven wards in two hospitals and presented our results to the prescribing physicians themselves and asked them to reflect on it. We also presented them the findings of a root cause analysis of their inappropriate prescriptions, and we subsequently asked us what they wanted and needed to improve (e.g. better guidelines, education). We then acted upon these wishes in close collaboration with them. For instance, one department with prior low guideline adherence wished to rewrite the antibiotic guideline and so we did and appropriateness increased afterwards. Overall, the DUMAS approach was associated with a 13% increase in antimicrobial appropriateness sustained for 12 months post intervention-start. We found no reduction in antimicrobial consumption.